KMS:
(K.M.
Sherrif)
|
You have defined Dalit literature as literature written about
Dalits. This appears to be the most reasonable definition because it takes
into consideration a significant segment of literature written by
sympathizers or ‘fellow travellers’ who are themselves not Dalits. Could you
elaborate?
|
HM:
(Harish Mangalam)
|
Yes literature written about Dalits is Dalit literature. But only literature written by writers who
come from the Dalit communities has the authenticity of experience and the
ring of truth. There is a saying in Gujarati : jode jene danke, enej
vednani khabar pade‘only the one who wears the shoe knows where it
bites’.this is true of Gujarati Dalit literature too. The works of non-Dalit
writers, though sympathetic to Dalits, are always likely to have a hollow
ring. Fellow travelers will always be fellow- travelers!
|
KMS
|
You have also stated, “If there can be a Gujarati Jain literature
and a Gujarati Parsi literature, then why not a Gujarati Dalit literature?” This seems to me a negative
reaction. Could you give a positive reason for the existence of a separate body
of Dalit literature? Is it the result of the assertion of a submerged
Identity?
|
HM
|
I would like to ask you whether there has ever been such a hue and
cry over Jain literature or Parsi literature as there has been over Dalit
literature. Obviously not. We are, therefore, quite justified in having our
doubts about such orchestrated opposition. If you can take these doubts as
pointers to a naked truth, then what you describe as my ‘negative reaction’
is also such a positive. For us, it is not a negative reaction, but a
positive one. It someone taken your
response to be a ‘reaction’, you would naturally assume that it
has had some impact. It is an assertion of the dignity of the fact is that it
is easier to flog Dalit literature than to compete with it!
|
KMS
|
Do you think that the birth of Dalit literature is the result of
the failure of the progressive literature movements (especially those with
Marxist orientation) to bring into proper perspective the socio-cultural
identities of Dalits and other deprived sections of society?
|
HM
|
I don’t think this is true of Gujarati Dalit literature nor of
Marathi Dalit literature. The writers who belong to progressive movements of
literature uphold the same basic human values that Dalit writers do. In fact many of the strands of the
various progressive literary movements have been woven into Gujarati Dalit literature.
Gujarati Dalit literature is a socio-literary movements deeply
influenced by the thoughts
of Mahatma Jyoti Phule and Dr. Babasaheb
Ambedkar. It is indebted
to the mass movements they led. In my collection of essays, Vidit, I
wrote: “Any work of literature which seeks to express in words, the pulses of
those sections of humanity which are oppressed and which are engaged in
struggles for their existence deserves to be called, in the broadest sense,
Dalit literature.”
|
KMS
|
Gujarati Dalit literature has not been able to make as much of an
impact on the literary scene as Marathi Dalit literature. In fact much of Gujarati
Dalit literature
shows the strong influence
of Marathi Dalit literature. Can you explain why this happened?
|
HM
|
Dalit literature is now a powerful influence In Gujarati too.
Marathi Dalit literature had its beginning before independence. It has thus
had a head-start over Gujarati Dalit literature. On the other hand, Gujarati
Dalit literature can be said to have taken off only with the anti-reservation
agitation of 1981. But it has already made a mark of its own. Guajarati Dalit
literature is cast in its own mould. As for its relation to Marathi Dalit
literature, inspiration is a factor, but not influence. For one thing, very
little of Marathi dalit writers have had little direct contact with it.
Influence or imitation is out of question.
|
KMS
|
Mangal Rathod once remarked that in much of Dalit literature, “The
situation is there, but not the inspiration.” Though much of Gujarati Dalit
literature does not bear this statement out, don’t you think there is an
element of truth in it; especially with regard to those poets and writers
whose works are merely reflex action, resisting the pomposity and hollowness
of the ‘academy culture’?
|
HM
|
Mangal Rathod might have remarked that “the situation is there,
but not the
Inspiration. “But I would like to point out that Dalit writers
are more concerned with ‘perspiration ‘than ‘inspiration’! in its pre-occupation
with fostering upholding human values, it cannot afford to be a decorative
piece or a consumer article. Dalit literature is not Dalit literature for
entertainment.
|
KMS
|
Will it be correct to say that the most significant works in both poetry and fiction in
Gujarati literature in the Eighties have come from Dalit writers,but remained
unrecognized? I am thinking of Kisan Sosa, Mohan Parmar. Mangal Rathod,
Yeshwant Vaghela, Narsingh Ujamba, Dalpat Chauhan, Harish Mangalam. . . and a
host of others.
|
HM
|
You are absolutely right there. The field of Gujarati literature
has been ploughed deeply by these writers and poets. Their contributions have
been substantial. Joseph Macwan, Dalpat Chauhan, Mohan Parmar, and B.N.
Vankar have kept the flame of Gujarati fiction burning. Joseph Macwan’s
collection of life-sketches, Vyathana Veetak has received the Kendra
Sahitya AKademy Award. Gujarati Dalit Varta, the collection of stories
edited by Mohan Parmar and me has
Mohan Parmar’s collection of stories, Nakalank. There are a few more
names worth mentioning: Pravin Gadhvi, Madhukant Kalpit, Pathik Parmar, Raghavji
Madhad and myself. In poetry, we have Kisan Sosa, Sahil Parmar, Raju Solanki,
Dalpat Chauhan, Shanker Painter and Nirav Patel. They all have the intensity
of expression. What they lack, perhaps, is the energy drawn from mass movements.
But things are changing for the better. As for recognition, Gujarati Dalit
writers have never banked on it much.
|
KMS
|
Being the creators of a body of committed literature, Dalit
writers obviously have to involve themselves in Social and political
activities to a large extent. How significant has been the role of Gujarati
Dalit writers in this regard?
|
HM
|
Gujarati writers have reinforced the saying, Darpan jhoot na
bole (A mirror tells no lies) by faithfully reflecting our vain, pretentious,
ritualistic and cosmetic society. They are by nature involved in socio-political
activities. In Gujarat, the cradle of the anti-reservation agitation, where
the strangle-hold of casteism is still to be broken, the voices of Dalit writers
have been courageous and undeterred. The role of Dalit writers in suuffing out the anti-Reservation of 1981 was
remarkable. That was perhaps their greatest achievement.
|
KMS
|
We have seen that considerable contributions have been made by
Dalit writes in both poetry and fiction. But haven’t they lagged behind in
drama, even street-plays being few and far between?
|
HM
|
The contributions in drama or even the performance of street plays
have not matched the achievements in poetry and fiction. There were some
significant efforts by Dalpat Chauhan whose plays for radio have received
awards from Akashawani. What is lacking is an organized theatre. Plays have
to be taken to the masses. In this regard, Raju Solanki deserves our
Commendation. Solanki, who has always been an activist first and a writer next,
has organized about twenty five performances of his street play, Bahmanvadni
Barakhadi (The ABC of
Brahmanism), most of them in North Gujarat, which is still haunted by the
spectre of untouchability. I feel that Dalit writers should realize the potential
drama holds out to them.
|
KMS
|
What do you think have been the drawbacks and failures of
Gujarati Dalit literature during the two decades of its existence?
|
HM
|
Not anything worth discussing, as far I can see. Dalit writers,
if they have the determination and unity in thinking can make a tremendous
impact on society with their works in which Man is always the centre.
|
KMS
|
Is the existence of Dalit literature a temporary phenomenon? Will
it join the so-called ‘mainstream literature’ in the near future, or will it
continue to maintain a dialectical relationship with it (as it appeats to be
doing now) for a long time to come?
|
HM
|
Looking at societies which have a democratic culture, I feel that
our Dalit literature is become a permanent phenomenon. If it continues to be
a force to Reckon with, Dalit literature will soon become the mainstream and
other streams will join it.
|
KMS
|
Do you think the formation o ‘Bahujan Sahitya Sankul’ by a
group of Gujarati Dalit writers in 1990, and the decision to give up the
term, ’Dalit’ for the more comprehensive term, ‘Bahujan’, covering the
bulk of the backward , oppressed section of society, a step in the right direction?
Do you think that this really reflects the polarization of social forces
underway in the country? Or is it too pre- mature,
a mere replay of the old alignments with their inherent short-coming?
|
HM
|
There is no specific issue which can be said to have led to the
formation of ‘Bahujan Sahitya Sankul’. The term , “Dalit ‘ has a wide
significance. Dalit literature has never been sectarian. It can take care of
all such ‘sankuls’. Dalit is certainly more appropriate and effective
than ‘Bahujan’. Such a formation would not be able to represent the real
Dalit literature effectively. The potential for a total polarization of
social forces in the country is already inherent in Dalit literature. There
is no need to augment it. Such an attempt will merely lead to augment it. Such an attempt will
merely lead to a replay of old alignments, as you put it.
|
KMS
|
Do you foresee a conglomeration of progressive literature forces
in the country-Secular, Marxist, Dalit, Environmentalist, Feminist –
converging to become a formidable cambating the forces of obscurantism and
fascism threatening to engulf the intellectual atmosphere of the country?
|
HM
|
Yes, it is certainly possible. All these forces were associated,
directly or indirectly, with Dalit literature right from the beginning.
Secular, Marxist, dalit, feminist and environmentalist movements are integral
parts of our social revolution.
|
KMS
|
There have been hardly any woman writers in the Gujarati Dalit
movement. For a movement which seeks to overthrow traditional values, this
seems to be a serious drawback. Can you explain why this happened? Does this
mean that there will one day be a feminist movement within the Dalit movement
at large?
|
HM
|
It is that there have been hardly any woman writers in the
Gujarati Dalit literary movement.
Perhaps a poet like Usha Makwana may
be mentioned, but not anybody of note. The reason is not far to seek. Most of
the Gujarati dalit writers of the present generation belong to north Gujarat,
notorious for its casteism, where the thrust of the Dalit movement was to get
education to get out of the quagmire of socio-economic backwardness. The men
among the Dalit communities registered Phenomenal success in this, making
effective use of their newly acquired education to combat untouchability and
casteism. They women were not so lucky. They continued to languish in the obsolete
customs and tradition of orthodox Hinduism. Early marriages, restrictions on
going out of the house etc. are still widely prevalent among them. A feminist
movement among Dalits will certainly be born – sooner or later. If it gains
momentum, it is also certain that the first women writers in Gujarati Dalit
literature will also emerge from North Gujarat.
|
KMS
|
Among Gujarati Dalit writers, among Gujarati writers in general,
the trend is to dabble in several genres at the same time-poetry, fiction,
prose, drama. There have been very few who have stuck to any one genre. Would
you say this has made many of them jacks-of-all-trades and masters of
none?
|
HM
|
I would say it shows their versatility. And many of them are
masters in their trades. I hope more such versatile writers would appear on
the literary scene.
|
KMS
|
What were the seminal influences in your career as a writer? I
understand that you have actively participated in various social and
political agitations related to the Dalit movement. Do you feel that this has
given a certain dynamism to your works, which is lacking in the works of your
contemporaries who are mere academic poets?
|
HM
|
The most seminal influence is the fact that I was born in a
small, obscure village of north Gujarat in a socially, economically and
politically backward community, oppressed by a murky social order. The
ruthless atrocities perpetrated on innocent workers are still fresh in my
memory. I still remember the nature of my illiterate father who never
succumbed to injustice. His determination and perseverance were extra-ordianary.
Jethabhai (that was his real name) knew well that farmers did not lag behind
the rest in exploiting the poor. He brought up our large family on what he
earned by weaving on a handloom. Poverty loomed large before me in my
childhood ,and its many manifestations have made me weep uncontrollably. Now
when I write, all these drips on the paper. Then came the anti-reservation agitation which was a traumatic
experience to me.
Hectic days followed. I became associated with ‘Dalit Adhikar
Manch’, ‘Sangharsh Sahitya Sangh’ and ‘All
India Bank of India SC/ST Employees Federation’. Then there were the literary
societies for social action: ‘Literature Study Forum’, ‘Saraswati Sewa Samaj
Trust’, ‘Kavya Ghoshti’ etc. I was compiler of ‘Akshay’ magazine
with Mohan Parmar . Being always active, my enthusiasm was unbounded.
Everything was so dynamic. Some of my contemporaries have remained mere
academic poets, as you call them. But most of my friends and contemporaries-Dalpat
Cahuhan, Raju solanki, J.K.Barot, Ashwin Desai, Sahil Parmar and Kardam Bhatt,
to name just a few – have always been active and
their works have retained the original dynamism.
|
KMS
|
Have you ever found your position as a civil servant a hindrance
to your creative activities?
|
HM
|
Government service is a hindrance to creative activities. I would
go further and say that is an imprisonment and a burden. The pen is shackled;
the words which well up from your depths are frozen. What good are my hands,
I often think. Being an officer is the last straw. Naturally, I have to
restrain myself. I murder my words. This is one of the reasons why Dalit
literature, as it is written by me and several of my fellow-writers who are
in Government service, has not been as aggressive as it should be. Its impact
on society often gets watered down.
|
KMS
|
Would it be correct to say that your poetry is more urban and
sophisticated than that of many of
your Contemporaries in Gujarati Dalit
literature and has drawn more from the contemporary socio-political milieu
rather from the folk traditions of rural Gujarat?
|
HM
|
I think I have written poems of both types. If you read my
collection of poems, Prakamp,
you will find that poems like ‘Damiyal Local’, ‘Gameni Geet’
and ‘Mer Bhoondina’ can be
related to the folk tradition. The majority of the poems,however, were born
in the more sophisticated contemporary socio-political milieu.
|
KMS
|
Are you involved in the composition of any major work now?
|
HM
|
There are a lot of things in my mind. But I don’t have as much
time as I would like to have. I am now working on a study of Dalit literature
and a long novel.
|
KMS
|
Do you think you have received the recognition that you deserve?
Or do you think academic distinctions don’t matter?
|
HM
|
Like other writers in the Dalit movement, I too have never
bothered about recognition. The extent of our commitment to the cause is what
really bothers us. That is what sets us apart from other writers.
|